Skip to main content

Assessment - Student Growth Portfolios

 Student growth portfolios are collections of evidence showing growth in standards or criteria (Sowers and Meyers, 2021). These can be maintained by either the teacher or by the student, and are usually utilized in parent conferences and communication. Increasingly, portfolios are kept in electronic form and connected to learning platforms such as Managebac or SeeSaw. 

So why would teachers have students collate samples of work? The benefits far outweigh the shortcomings. Student-maintained portfolios encourage students to take ownership of their work, reflect on their learning journey, and increase metacognitive skills (Sowers and Meyers, 2021). 

Some disadvantages to maintaining these portfolios include the time spent collecting and reflecting on work, which takes time away from content instruction, and the difficulty some students and parents have with the technological aspect of the electronic portfolio. Additionally, not all students will receive feedback at the same level on their portfolios, as this is determined by the individual teacher’s commitment to the student growth portfolio model. 

Aurelia and Dad at SLC Day


In my school, we use student growth portfolios in conjunction with Managebac in order to provide parents with a consistent and current picture of their student’s learning. This has proved to be good in some ways, with parents being interested in their students’ work; however, it is also a challenge in that some teachers are not consistently following up with having students put work in their portfolios, so the practice seems uneven. 


Reference

Sowers, K. L., & Meyers, S. (2021). Integrating essential learning outcomes and electronic portfolios: Recommendations for assessment of student growth, course objectives, program outcomes, and accreditation standards. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2021(166), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20451


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Assessment - Formative or Summative?

Many teachers learn about formative and summative assessments while they are engaging in education coursework; however, translating these types of assessments to the practical classroom can be a significant challenge. Using formative and summative assessments in tandem enables teachers to monitor progress and achievement while also implementing engaging and relevant authentic assessments for standards and criteria. The figure below outlines some differences between the two (Dixson and Worrell, 2016). Even if teachers understand the difference between formative and summative assessments, they can often struggle to identify how to use these in their classrooms. Below are some examples of formative and summative assessments used commonly by teachers (Yale, 2021).  Formative: Exit tickets, class discussions, weekly quizzes, Kahoots, homework assignments.  Summative: Projects, essays, standardized testing, unit tests, presentations.  Striking a balance between formative...

Assessment - How Do Figures Help?

Assessment can be quite difficult for parents and students to understand. Visualizing data in figures is an essential tool for interpreting data and applying it to instruction design. The use of data has also been proven to increase collaboration among teachers, which in turn increases student achievement (Cavalluzzo et al., 2013). Data can also be used to visualize growth and areas of challenge according to specific standards or criteria.  At our school, we use data in a variety of ways in the assessment process. One of the most prominent is the schoolwide use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) data. This data is gathered twice a year in reading and math, and is used to differentiate instruction as well as group students for interventions if necessary. The data is always available for parents to view, and the school has conducted workshops on reading and understanding these figures.  Attached here is a sample from my daughter’s Grade 2 MAP test this past school year. Th...

Assessment - Which is Best?

When choosing what type of assessment you will use in a classroom, you must first ask yourself several questions:  Is this a formative or summative assessment? How much time do I (the teacher) have to compose and grade the assessment? How many standards or criteria should the assessment evaluate?  These questions will determine what type of assessment best fits your situation. Depending upon the answers, you may choose one of three types, and each one has different advantages and disadvantages.  Selected-Response Assessments : Students choose one of several potential answers. Pros: Objective scoring, quick to grade, produce easy to analyze data.  Cons: No higher-level thinking assessed, limited feedback, not authentic assessment (Seifert and Sutton, 2022). Open-Ended Assessments : Students create an original response to a question. Pros: Can be adapted to higher-level thinking, authentic assessment.  Cons: Takes more time to grade and create assessments (Wasil e...