Skip to main content

Assessment - What is the Student's Role?

 Students should be continually self-assessing throughout instruction. This can be accomplished through sharing rubrics, SWBATs, and examples of work from different units. As a language arts teacher, I was constantly teaching self-assessment through the writing, revising, and editing process. Students were given checklists to use to self-assess their writing and look for improvements. These checklists are essential tools for accomplishing self-assessment, as students must be guided through the process (Tavsanli and Kara, 2021). 




Students can certainly have a role in developing assessments. One of the most effective ways of implementing student feedback into assessment is through a rubric unpacking activity. By closely examining the rubric used for an assessment, students can put the criteria into their own words and use examples for better understanding. When I taught the International Baccalaureate curriculum, we used task-specific criteria to help students comprehend the expectations for each assessment and make notes of them to further guide their work. 


Reference


Tavsanli, Ö. F., & Kara, Ü. E. (2021). The effect of a peer and self-assessment-based editorial study on students’ ability to follow spelling rules and use punctuation marks correctly. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 268–284.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Assessment - Formative or Summative?

Many teachers learn about formative and summative assessments while they are engaging in education coursework; however, translating these types of assessments to the practical classroom can be a significant challenge. Using formative and summative assessments in tandem enables teachers to monitor progress and achievement while also implementing engaging and relevant authentic assessments for standards and criteria. The figure below outlines some differences between the two (Dixson and Worrell, 2016). Even if teachers understand the difference between formative and summative assessments, they can often struggle to identify how to use these in their classrooms. Below are some examples of formative and summative assessments used commonly by teachers (Yale, 2021).  Formative: Exit tickets, class discussions, weekly quizzes, Kahoots, homework assignments.  Summative: Projects, essays, standardized testing, unit tests, presentations.  Striking a balance between formative...

Assessment - How Do Figures Help?

Assessment can be quite difficult for parents and students to understand. Visualizing data in figures is an essential tool for interpreting data and applying it to instruction design. The use of data has also been proven to increase collaboration among teachers, which in turn increases student achievement (Cavalluzzo et al., 2013). Data can also be used to visualize growth and areas of challenge according to specific standards or criteria.  At our school, we use data in a variety of ways in the assessment process. One of the most prominent is the schoolwide use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) data. This data is gathered twice a year in reading and math, and is used to differentiate instruction as well as group students for interventions if necessary. The data is always available for parents to view, and the school has conducted workshops on reading and understanding these figures.  Attached here is a sample from my daughter’s Grade 2 MAP test this past school year. Th...

Assessment - Which is Best?

When choosing what type of assessment you will use in a classroom, you must first ask yourself several questions:  Is this a formative or summative assessment? How much time do I (the teacher) have to compose and grade the assessment? How many standards or criteria should the assessment evaluate?  These questions will determine what type of assessment best fits your situation. Depending upon the answers, you may choose one of three types, and each one has different advantages and disadvantages.  Selected-Response Assessments : Students choose one of several potential answers. Pros: Objective scoring, quick to grade, produce easy to analyze data.  Cons: No higher-level thinking assessed, limited feedback, not authentic assessment (Seifert and Sutton, 2022). Open-Ended Assessments : Students create an original response to a question. Pros: Can be adapted to higher-level thinking, authentic assessment.  Cons: Takes more time to grade and create assessments (Wasil e...